Evidence-aware extraordinary-ability workflow

O-1 Petition Drafting Software for Law Firms

Infinity turns an O-1 evidence record into a structured drafting workflow. It can classify achievements by proposed criterion, capture source-linked facts, identify weak or missing inputs, prepare forms and firm-template narratives, organize exhibits, and give attorneys a visible decision queue before final review.

Review an O-1 workflow

O-1 drafting starts with an evidence matrix

A folder of impressive documents is not yet a petition record. Each item needs context, a proposed use, and a traceable source.

Evidence lane
Examples to collect and normalize
Preparation output
Awards and recognition
Award criteria, granting body, selectivity, year, announcement, press, and proof of receipt.
Criterion worksheet, source notes, proposed exhibit labels, and unresolved context requests.
Press and published material
Publication, date, author, circulation or reach, article subject, translations, and full copies.
Article inventory, beneficiary-focused excerpts, publication context, and citation-ready exhibit descriptions.
Judging and critical roles
Invitations, selection criteria, event or organization standing, duties, outcomes, and corroborating records.
Chronology, role summary, organization evidence map, and fact questions for attorney review.
Original contributions and authorship
Work product, adoption or impact records, citations, patents, publications, references, and independent support.
Contribution-to-evidence map, expert letter inputs, publication list, and source-linked narrative facts.

From raw achievements to attorney-ready petition

1 · Scope

Configure the case path

Capture petitioner or agent structure, beneficiary field, requested dates, itinerary or events, work locations, consultation needs, and the firm's proposed evidence lanes.

2 · Collect

Request evidence with context

Ask for complete source records, translations, independent corroboration, contracts, itinerary items, advisory opinion materials, and missing facts—not just file uploads.

3 · Map

Build criterion and exhibit views

Classify evidence under attorney-configured theories, record which source supports each factual statement, detect duplicates, and flag items without enough context.

4 · Draft

Prepare forms and narratives

Prepare I-129 and applicable classification data, G-28, I-907 when used, petition letter sections, recommendation or expert letter drafts, and exhibit descriptions from firm templates.

5 · Check

Run cross-record QA

Compare names, dates, organizations, titles, event periods, compensation facts, and exhibit references across forms, letters, itinerary, contracts, and source documents.

6 · Review

Escalate legal decisions

Present evidence gaps, competing classifications, low-confidence facts, and draft outputs so counsel can decide criterion fit, totality, positioning, and final filing content.

Forms, supporting records, and review outputs

Petition materials

  • Form I-129 and applicable classification supplement data
  • Form G-28 and Form I-907 when applicable
  • Firm-template petition letter and criterion sections
  • Contract, deal memo, itinerary, and agent/petitioner record checklist
  • Advisory opinion or consultation tracking

Evidence and handoff

  • Criterion evidence matrix with source links
  • Recommendation and expert letter input packets
  • Exhibit list, labels, descriptions, and duplicate checks
  • Missing-context and contradiction queue
  • Attorney review notes and configured CMS status update

Supported versus conceptual

Infinity supports configured document review, evidence matrices, forms, firm-template drafting, exhibit organization, and consistency checks. It does not independently determine whether a criterion or final-merits standard is met. Portal submission, tracking, and case-management updates require a supported, enabled integration.

Attorney review controls the O-1 strategy

Counsel selects the classification theory, decides which evidence belongs under each criterion, evaluates admissibility and weight, applies the final-merits analysis, edits all arguments, and approves the final filing. Infinity makes the underlying record easier to inspect and draft from.

See the complete AI immigration drafting software workflow.

Compare drafting approaches in the buyer comparison.

Review case-capacity options on the pricing page.

Frequently asked questions

How does Infinity organize O-1 evidence?

Configured workflows classify source documents by proposed criterion, capture dates and relevant facts, identify duplicates or gaps, and build a reviewer-visible evidence matrix and exhibit index.

Can Infinity decide whether an O-1 criterion is satisfied?

No. Infinity can organize and summarize evidence, but attorneys decide criterion fit, evidentiary weight, totality, strategy, and eligibility.

What O-1 materials can be drafted?

Configured outputs can include Form I-129 data and applicable supplements, Form G-28, Form I-907 when used, petition letters, expert or recommendation letter drafts, exhibit lists, and review notes.

Test the evidence workflow on one O-1 matter

Bring your evidence matrix, petition template, and exhibit conventions.

Book an O-1 workflow review